COP delivers little, maintains threat of climate collapse and draws global criticism
Civil entities simultaneously acknowledged progress and possibilities for curbing fossil fuels and deforestation
Belém (PA) – With no mention in the official text of eliminating fossil fuels and deforestation – the two largest global sources of emissions – or of where all the money needed to contain the climate crisis will come from, COP30 has become the target of criticism, especially from international civil society.
For the executive director of Greenpeace Brazil, Carolina Pasquali, some countries continue not to treat urgency as urgency or crisis as crisis.
“The COP of Truth revealed the truths that, unfortunately, we already know: the lobby of fossil fuels, agribusiness giants and other sectors that continue to profit from our destruction has been successful in holding back progress and shuffling the game,” she said.
Director for Latin America and the Caribbean of the NGO 350.org, Ilan Zugman, reinforced that the lack of concrete commitments in the final text of COP30 shows who continues to benefit from the delay. “It is the fossil fuel industry and the ultra-rich, not those who live the climate crisis day after day.”
According to Laura Restrepo Alameda, from the Climate Action Network Latin America (CANLA), the refusal of developed countries to include anything concrete in the texts regarding the transition revealed a lack of political will incompatible with the 1.5°C limit.
“This failure jeopardizes intergenerational rights, especially those of children, who will inherit a crisis they did not create. It also highlights the urgent need for honest conversations about justice, reparations, and structural responsibility,” she emphasized.
However, the Global South, above all, no longer has time to wait for another COP that does not seriously consider the need to transition beyond fossil fuels, such as oil and coal, stressed Carolina Sánchez Naranjo, coordinator of the Greater Fossil-Free Caribbean Network.
“Every year, many of our Caribbean countries need between 5% and 10% of their GDP just to recover from hurricanes and climate disasters caused by emissions from the Global North,” she reported.
Regarding the lack of money, Ana Carolina González Espinosa, Senior Director of Programs at the Natural Resource Governance Institute (NRGI), said that turning words into action will also require a profound change in financial support to ensure that the energy transition is both fair and viable.
“Without this, expecting people and communities in the oil-producing regions of the Global South to undertake high-risk transitions will remain an impossible dream,” she pointed out.
Furthermore, the dramatic absence of decisions on roadmaps for the energy transition and for reducing global deforestation ultimately fails to strengthen multilateralism, assessed Fernanda Carvalho, Global Leader of Climate and Energy Policy at WWF International.
“These roadmaps would allow progress from the commitment made in 2023 in Dubai (COP28), especially at a time when national emissions reduction targets, the NDCs, remain insufficient to keep average global warming to 1.5°C,” he detailed.
Beyond the COP horizon
Marking a decade after the Paris Climate Agreement at COP21, which brought the current targets to avoid climate collapse, COP30 ended up reaping advances on other negotiating fronts, according to sources from civil entities.
For Zugman, the global mobilization in the streets of Belém boosted a coalition of nearly 90 countries supporting the end of the production and use of fossil fuels. “This momentum is already unstoppable, starting with the conference on the elimination of fossil fuels in Colombia next April.”
“We hope to advance the dialogue to accelerate the transition to the elimination of fossil fuels after COP30,” Naranjo added about the event.
In this sense, Tatiana Oliveira, international strategy leader at WWF-Brazil, assessed that COP30 was a watershed moment in recognizing that climate action goes beyond the formal rooms of the UNFCCC. “The distance between social force and the fragile pages of the agreement shows that solutions come from people and territories.”
“Many victories that really matter, such as the inclusion of Afro-descendants in the text and the mention of the territorial rights of indigenous peoples and Free, Prior and Informed Consent, are historic steps that help guarantee rights,” she highlighted.
Regarding this context, Gisela Hurtado, campaign coordinator for the Amazon at Stand.earth, highlighted the recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples – including their right to self-determination – as a victory of the COP, “held for the first time in the Amazon, home to most of the world’s isolated peoples.”
Regarding these populations, Pasquali highlighted the historical indigenous participation that led to the homologation and recognition of lands, the giant Global Climate March, and resources mobilized for forests.
“Certainly, there is a legacy of engagement and mobilization that we have not yet been able to measure, but which will bring positive impacts to our country,” he pointed out.
The executive director of WWF-Brazil, Maurício Voivodic, said that 117 plans were mobilized to accelerate large-scale solutions, involving sectors throughout Brazil and the world, in a conference marked by the strong inclusion of social groups such as indigenous peoples and local communities.
“COP30 presented important results that go beyond the official negotiation texts, and this should be taken into account. Climate action is not – and should not be – restricted to formal conversations,” he stressed.
This report was produced by ((oeco)), through the Collaborative Socio-environmental Coverage of COP 30. Read the original report at https://oeco.org.br/reportagens/cop-entrega-pouco-mantem-ameaca-de-colapso-climatico-e-colhe-criticas-globais/
